Nathan Levinson, Founder, President and CEO of Royal York Property Management.
As we head into late 2025, Toronto’s real estate market shift has moved from anomaly to reality. Sales volumes and prices continue to decline, while available inventory skyrockets. For professionals navigating real estate, urban planning or municipal finance, these trends warrant keen attention.
Market Overview: Cooling Momentum
Toronto Regional Real Estate Board (TRREB) data reveals ongoing declines in Greater Toronto Area home transactions and prices. In March, sales dropped 2.4% month-over-month, followed by February’s staggering 28.5% fall. Although sales rebounded modestly in April, prices remain below levels seen in early 2024.
June’s benchmark home price dipped to a four-year low of 995,100 Canadian dollars, with average Toronto prices around CA$1,101,691, according to a report by the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board. Inventory has surged; active listings exceeded 31,600 units, while sales declined from 6,397 in 2024 to 6,243 in 2025, signaling a buyer’s market.
I’ve seen these patterns emerge before, but not with this intensity. The decoupling between listing volumes and buyer absorption is growing more pronounced each quarter. In this environment, pricing discipline and nimble product offerings, especially in the mid-market, are vital to prevent prolonged capital stagnation.
Economic Pressures: Broader Impact
Reuters noted that uncertainty with the U.S. has dampened buyer confidence. Rising tariffs and economic friction have discouraged purchases, even as interest rates trend downward. The Bank of Canada has reduced its benchmark rate by 2.25 percentage points since June 2024, per Reuters, but demand remains cautious.
Toronto’s slowdown is visible not only in sales but also in construction. According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, the city is on pace for its lowest annual housing starts in nearly three decades. Condominium starts declined by about 60% year-over-year in the first half of 2025, while rental apartment starts fell by roughly 8%.
As a result, municipalities are likely learning a painful but important truth: Fiscal overdependence on property transactions can create structural fragility. My counsel to civic leaders is to begin stress-testing budgetary models under multiple demand scenarios. Real estate-driven revenues can no longer be assumed, nor should they be.
Strategic Implications For Business Leaders And Urban Policymakers
1. Diversify revenue streams.
From the perspective of developers and corporate real estate managers, a key action I recommend is to build financial models that anticipate new municipal fees and stress-test projects under higher soft-cost assumptions. Preparing contingency budgets now can reduce exposure later.
Meanwhile, cities relying heavily on real estate transactions, like Toronto, may need to pivot. Forecasts show over CA$1.3 billion in reserve use may be needed to bridge budget gaps. To reduce vulnerability, municipalities could explore business licensing fees, tourism levies or user‑based charges.
2. Time infrastructure and planning decisions.
With high inventory and price pressure, land‑use and planning departments may need to delay new builds or revisit zoning plans. Development charges may offer temporary relief to developers, but longer-term solutions require planning consistency and infrastructure foresight.
There’s an opportunity here. Cities can use this breather to prioritize infrastructure audits and reallocate capital toward transit, flood mitigation and digital connectivity assets that will improve project viability when demand returns. Smart capital deployment today sets the stage for sustainable acceleration tomorrow.
3. Shift to a buyer‑friendly mindset.
This is no longer a seller’s market. For lenders, developers and other transaction stakeholders, it pays to simplify closing timelines, offer incentives and price competitively. Savvy investors and buyers can negotiate more effectively but must act quickly when appealing inventory emerges.
In markets like this, trust is currency. Those who win are those who make transactions easier, not just cheaper. This includes transparent disclosures, responsive service and meaningful perks. The sales experience matters more now than ever.
4. Monitor trade and economic policy carefully.
Key variables like U.S. tariffs and potential trade agreements carry macroeconomic weight. Next-level risk management for corporate real estate portfolios includes sensitivity analysis tied to Canadian‑U.S. trade dynamics.
This is where leadership must evolve from reactive to anticipatory. I advise portfolio managers to establish internal “policy monitors” who track trade developments, foreign investment policy and interest rate signals, not just headlines. Risk is no longer abstract; it’s a weekly line-item conversation.
5. Seize long‑term rental prospects.
Despite short‑term softness, renting remains a viable play. Constrained land supply and persistent affordability challenges continue to support demand. Investors focusing on long‑term hold strategies may find attractive returns.
Final Thoughts
Toronto’s real estate market slowdown underscores a larger lesson: Real estate is not just property sanitation; it is an economic structure. High inventory, weaker prices and trade turbulence pose urgent challenges to traders, developers and policymakers.
Adaptability is essential. Strategy must evolve, from diversifying policy levers to recalibrating pricing and communications. In an uncertain 2025, those who move with clarity and discipline are most likely to gain market advantage.
In the end, volatility separates the reactive from the resilient. The winners of this cycle will be those who invest in foresight, act decisively on fundamentals and remain relentlessly focused on value creation, not valuation alone.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?