As the Los Angeles area fires rage on, tens of thousands of people are left displaced. Those who lost homes to the flames are scrambling to find new or temporary housing, but face a massive barrier: Many listing prices on the market have shot up—by a lot.
Last Tuesday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency, which bans any rent increase above 10 percent for the period of the crisis. But a number of news reports found this week that asking rents for homes have skyrocketed across Los Angeles County—sometimes by as much as 86 percent. With focus on a new wind and fire threat issued for today, government enforcement of “price gouging” could be problematic.
Jacking up the rent to meet surging demands is a common and often illegal practice after climate-fueled disasters like fires and hurricanes. For Los Angeles, specifically, a fire-squeezed and pricey rental market could exacerbate an existing housing crisis and further widen the gap between the rich and poor in the city, experts say.
Disaster Demand: In September, a furnished, four-bedroom home in the ritzy LA neighborhood Bel Air was listed at $15,900 per month on the online real-estate marketplace Zillow. On Saturday morning, as firefighters struggled to contain the still-burning Palisades fire a few miles away, the same home was relisted for $29,500 per month, LAist discovered.
When the news outlet asked the listing agent about why the advertised rent for the Bel Air home had surged, “she said she was getting another call and hung up,” LAist’s David Wagner wrote. The listing was later taken down. But it’s far from the only instance in which a landlord or agency is looking to profit off the city’s fire-fueled housing plight. A New York Times’ analysis of Zillow active rental listings revealed that several property rental prices in West Los Angeles have risen by more than the legal 10 percent since last Tuesday.
Officials are asking people to report any instances of price gouging to the California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office. In a press conference on Saturday, Bonta warned that the practice is “a crime punishable by up to a year in jail and fines.”
Research shows that housing changes often extend beyond the affected area of a city as people try to avoid future fires. For example, after the Camp fire decimated the northeastern California town of Paradise in 2018, a mass exodus of survivors flooded the nearby town of Chico, nearly doubling its population of 92,000. One year later, the median asking rent for a two-bedroom home was 25 percent higher on average, NBC News reports.
The same situation often happens after hurricanes. A 2023 study analyzing 19 eastern and coastal states from 2009 to 2018 found that the occurrence of a hurricane in a given year or the previous year reduces overall affordable rental housing, especially for counties with higher percentages of people of color. Experts stress that renters can be more vulnerable than people who own homes because they are less likely to have adequate insurance or qualify for as much immediate financial assistance from the government after a storm.
“[It’s] the fundamental sin in our disaster policy in this country, that everything is based on property and possession,” Carlos Martín, a housing and climate researcher at Harvard University, told NPR in July. “It compounds these differences between the landed-gentry haves and the rest of the country that are have-nots.”
A City in Crisis: Since 1960, the Los Angeles metropolitan area’s population has nearly doubled from more than 6 million to over 12 million today. But housing availability is lagging behind: LA had a shortage of about 337,000 homes as of 2022, according to data from Zillow.
Journalist Jireh Deng wrote for Inside Climate News last week about how housing policies have encouraged development in hillsides and mountains to fill some of the gaps, which put people directly in the path of fire-vulnerable areas and made it difficult for emergency responders to access certain areas quickly.
The fires did not discriminate between high or low-income neighborhoods in LA, damaging or destroying celebrity homes and affordable housing complexes alike. However, recovery will undoubtedly look different for those who were already struggling to manage in one of the most expensive cities in the U.S. In the short term, Airbnb’s nonprofit wing and a local nonprofit group, 211 LA, are coordinating free temporary housing for displaced people, while some hotels are offering discounted stays.
But people who lost their homes are currently facing a tough decision: to stay and try to rebuild or leave the city altogether. Experts say the fires will likely trigger a surge in homelessness. While some people may be able to afford a new house, the impending rise of insurance costs in the wake of the LA fires could make home ownership too much of a stretch for many.
On Monday, Gov. Newsom proposed $2.5 billion in additional funding for emergency response efforts and to help kick start recovery in LA, though President-elect Donald Trump and a group of House Republicans have discussed tying wildfire aid conditionally to a debt ceiling increase agreement in Congress.
It’s difficult to know how LA’s housing crisis will play out as the fires rage on and threaten to wreak even more havoc across the distressed city. The impacts will likely endure for years, experts say.
“A lot of people were barely scraping by, and this will push more people over the edge,” Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at the Columbia Climate School, said in a post on the university’s website. “For most people, the recovery doesn’t take weeks or months. It can take years and sometimes even decades for communities to recover.”
More Top Climate News
Domestic oil and gas production has reached an all-time high in the United States. But an analysis by The New York Times revealed that fossil fuel companies employ roughly 25 percent fewer workers than they did a decade ago. Part of the reason is because oil and gas extraction and transportation has become more productive, but that comes at the cost of jobs for communities across the country that have relied on the industry for their livelihoods. Another factor: “The decline in oil and gas work also reflects the continuing transition to cleaner forms of energy, even if that shift is happening more slowly than many analysts had anticipated a few years ago,” Rebecca F. Elliott writes for the Times.
Trump’s team and Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey are drafting an executive order to “halt offshore wind turbine activities” along the East coast, according to a press release from the Congressman’s office. The announcement states that the order will be finalized in the first few months of the administration, which Heatmap’s Jael Holzman points out is “a far cry from Trump’s promise to stop projects on Day 1.” Nonetheless, the proposed order could jeopardize every offshore wind farm in the U.S.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from oil and gas companies trying to block a lawsuit filed by Honolulu over their role in climate change. Marking a win for climate activists, the decision paves the way for similar climate-related lawsuits, Lindsay Whitehurst reports for The Associated Press. The oil industry is pushing back against these suits, which are happening across the U.S. and could cost companies billions.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,