Key Points
-
Reverse stock splits, unlike forward splits, are often seen as red flags, signaling financial distress rather than growth confidence.
-
Lucid Group’s (LCID) 1-for-10 reverse split on Sept. 2 boosted its share price but failed to address core issues like production shortfalls and losses.
-
The market’s 14% rally post-split may reflect misread optimism, as fundamental challenges persist.
-
Nvidia made early investors rich, but there is a new class of ‘Next Nvidia Stocks’ that could be even better. Click here to learn more.
A Split Decision
Stock splits often spark excitement in the market, which are seen as bullish signals. When a company’s stock splits, reducing the price per share, investors interpret it as management’s confidence in future growth, expecting the lower price to attract more buyers and drive momentum.
Reverse stock splits, however, are a different beast. They are typically undertaken by companies in financial distress and the split consolidates the number of shares outstanding to boost the price, often to meet exchange listing requirements, like maintaining a price above $1.
For luxury electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID), the 1-for-10 reverse stock split executed on Sept. 2 lifted its share price from below $2 to a closing price of $17.66 per share. While the stock dipped 8% over the next two days, it surged 14% on Friday, closing the week 4% above its post-split adjusted price. Was this the catalyst Lucid needed to reignite growth, or is it a fleeting mirage?
Lucid’s Bumpy Road
Lucid has faced significant hurdles since its 2021 SPAC debut. The company has consistently missed ambitious delivery targets, projecting 20,000 vehicles in 2022, 49,000 in 2023, and 90,000 in 2024, but delivering only 4,369, 6,001, and 10,241, respectively.
Its second-quarter earnings report last month underscored the EV maker’s ongoing struggles. Lucid reported a net loss of $739.3 million, better than the $768.3 million expected but worse than the $643.4 million loss a year ago.
Its gross loss margin was a staggering 105%, driven by production bottlenecks and high fixed costs, exacerbated by a $54 million tariff impact. The company also cut its 2025 production guidance from 20,000 to 18,000 to 20,000 vehicles, signaling persistent operational inefficiencies. Leadership turmoil, including the February 2025 departure of CEO Peter Rawlinson, and a $3.1 billion net loss in 2024 — equating to $299,000 per vehicle sold — further cloud Lucid’s outlook.
Cosmetic Fix, Fundamental Flaws
A reverse stock split is a superficial maneuver that doesn’t address underlying issues. A study by NYU’s Stern School of Business found that companies undergoing reverse splits underperform their non-splitting peers by increasing margins for years afterward, as the split merely masks financial woes.
While exceptions like Citigroup (NYSE:C), AIG (NYSE:AIG), and Priceline (rebranded as Booking.com (NASDAQ:BKNG)) have seen post-split success, most companies falter because the split doesn’t fix core problems.
For Lucid, the reverse split was not driven by an immediate delisting threat, as its stock was above $1, but rather an attempt to attract institutional investors by lifting the price from penny-stock territory. However, with staggering gross loss margins, reliance on $1.67 billion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, and a market cap of $5.7 billion against Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) $1.13 trillion, Lucid’s challenges — production bottlenecks, high costs, and lack of profitability — remain unresolved.
The company’s pivot to a more affordable SUV, potentially named “Earth” in 2026, is promising but unproven.
Key Takeaway
Investors cheered Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard raising his price target on LCID stock to $20 from $3 per share post-split, implying 13% upside from the $17.66 adjusted price. However, this adjustment reflects an actual cut from what would have been an effective $30 pre-split target, indicating at best tempered optimism.
The market’s 14% rally on Friday misinterpreted this as a bullish signal, but a 13% potential gain is modest for a high-beta stock like LCID, which has lost 55.48% over the past year. Sheppard’s neutral rating also aligns with broader analyst caution, with targets ranging from $10 to an old outlier of $70 per share but the consensus “Hold” reflects deep skepticism.
Given Lucid’s unresolved operational and financial challenges, a reverse split alone won’t alter its trajectory. A more prudent stance than neutral would be to issue a more realistic sell rating, as the stock’s volatility and lack of a clear path to profitability outweigh any short-term enthusiasm.
“The Next NVIDIA” Could Change Your Life
If you missed out on NVIDIA’s historic run, your chance to see life-changing profits from AI isn’t over.
The 24/7 Wall Street Analyst who first called NVIDIA’s AI-fueled rise in 2009 just published a brand-new research report named “The Next NVIDIA.”
Download your FREE copy today.
The post Lucid Soars 14% — Was the Reverse Stock Split Just What the EV Maker Needed? appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..