What if the secret to eating less wasn’t portion control or calorie counting, but chili peppers? For centuries, spice has added excitement to meals. Now, it may also offer a simple way to manage how much you eat.
New research from Penn State shows that a small boost in spiciness can lead to reduced calorie intake without affecting how much you enjoy your food.
Eating behaviors are influenced by many things – taste, texture, aroma, and even how fast you chew. Most strategies aimed at reducing food intake focus on controlling portions or changing food composition. But this study highlights a different path: tweaking oral burn.
That warm, tingly sensation from capsaicin – the compound in chili peppers – might be doing more than just making your tongue tingle.
Researchers conducted three controlled experiments to understand if chili heat could reduce energy intake. Their findings were clear: a little heat slows you down and helps you eat less.
Spicy food slows eating
Paige Cunningham, a postdoctoral researcher at Penn State who led the study, said that her team suspected that making a meal spicier might slow people down.
“We thought, let’s test, under controlled experimental conditions in the lab, if adding a small amount of spice, but not so much that the meal is inedible, will make people eat slower and therefore eat less,” explained Cunningham.
The research team designed three experiments using two familiar meals: beef chili and chicken tikka masala. Each participant consumed both a mild and a spicy version of the meal across different visits.
The key manipulation involved adjusting the ratio of hot to sweet paprika while keeping everything else – flavor, texture, macronutrients – constant. Every session was recorded to track bite size, eating rate, meal duration, and more.
They found that adding spice didn’t make the meal unpleasant. Instead, it changed how people ate. The spicy meals were consumed more slowly. Eating rate dropped, and participants took fewer bites per minute. Interestingly, participants still liked the spicy meals just as much.
Spicy beef and tikka led to eating less food
In Experiment 1, participants consumed about 46 grams less of the spicy beef chili compared to the mild version. That’s a 13% reduction in intake, which also meant 53 fewer kilocalories.
The eating rate was 11% slower during the spicy meal, and the bite rate dropped as well. However, total meal duration and bite size didn’t change significantly. Participants simply took more time between bites, eating more thoughtfully.
“This points to added chilies as a potential strategy for reducing the risk of energy overconsumption,” said John Hayes, professor of food science and co-author on the study. “Next time you’re looking to eat a little less, try adding a blast of chilies, as it may slow you down and help you eat less.”
Experiment 2a used chicken tikka masala instead of chili. Here, the manipulation failed – the spicy version was not perceived as much spicier than the mild one. As a result, there was no significant difference in intake or eating behavior.
This outcome stressed an important point: the effect depends on the perceptible level of heat. Mild differences won’t move the needle.
A stronger spice yields stronger results
To address the failed manipulation in Experiment 2a, the researchers revised their approach in Experiment 2b. They increased the paprika content in the chicken tikka and ensured the spicy version delivered a noticeable burn.
This time, the result mirrored the chili experiment. Participants ate 64 grams less spicy tikka, a reduction of 18%. Eating rate dropped by 17%, and bite frequency also decreased.
The spice didn’t make the food less enjoyable. In both chili and tikka trials, liking scores remained stable. Appetite ratings before and after meals also stayed roughly the same. What changed was how people interacted with the food. The spicy versions encouraged slower, more mindful eating.
Notably, water consumption didn’t vary between mild and spicy versions. This ruled out a common assumption: that drinking more water fills people up. “This is why we need to do empirical studies of behavior, because what you might intuitively expect is often not the case,” Hayes remarked.
Mechanisms and possible thresholds
So, what’s actually happening here? The likely mechanism is increased oro-sensory exposure. Spicy foods stay in the mouth longer, allowing time for fullness signals to reach the brain. This has been linked with reduced energy intake in earlier studies involving texture changes.
But here, the change was chemical, not physical. That makes it a novel method for influencing eating behavior.
Interestingly, the data suggests a potential threshold effect. The spicy version in Experiment 2a didn’t yield any change because it wasn’t spicy enough. In contrast, Experiment 2b used a 4% hot paprika blend, producing a spiciness rating around 68 out of 101.
That version led to real behavior changes. The spicy beef chili in Experiment 1, rated at 54, also caused a measurable reduction. Meals that reached a certain burn intensity consistently led to slower eating and lower intake.
Individual differences and tolerance
The study also explored how personal traits affect response to spice. Participants with higher levels of neuroticism and openness were less responsive to spice changes.
However, traits like age, BMI, and frequency of eating spicy food didn’t seem to affect outcomes. That said, the researchers did recruit only moderate spice consumers. This reduced variability and helped maintain experimental control.
No participants reported discomfort, and the spice levels used fell well below extreme intensity.
This suggests there’s a “sweet spot” for oral burn – strong enough to affect eating, but not so strong that it reduces meal enjoyment or causes distress. Meals rated around 50–70 on the spice scale seem to hit that balance.
Adding spice can change eating habits
The broader implications of this research are promising. Spicy food is widely used around the world, and the ingredients – like chili pepper and paprika – are affordable and accessible.
As capsaicin gains attention for its potential health benefits, including improved metabolism and satiety, these findings add another layer: it can reshape how we eat.
In daily life, eating occurs in varied environments. While this study happened in a lab, it still shows a robust effect across different dishes. The results also challenge the idea that we must alter what we eat to eat less. Instead, we may just need to adjust how we experience it.
“This reduction in intake occurred without negatively impacting how much participants liked the food,” said Hayes. That’s a significant point. No one wants to sacrifice enjoyment for control. Here, you don’t have to.
Adding chili to your plate
From chili con carne to tikka masala, a little extra heat might be a gentle nudge toward eating less. The key lies in slowing down the eating process. That pause between bites, triggered by oral burn, gives your body time to say, “I’m full.”
These findings invite more exploration. Can this strategy help long-term? Will it work in more diverse populations or in social eating situations? And what is the best spice level to use at home?
While those questions remain, one thing is clear – adding a little chili might do more than wake up your taste buds. It might just help you regain control over your plate.
The study is published in the journal Food Quality and Preference.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–